Country Life Biochem
Posted on 16 June 2009
A theoretical study of biological metabolism and life cycle of substances (1)
- Analyze the serious omission in traditional theory
and bring new ideas in the theory
Abstract: The discovery and correction of an error always go together, and there is a relationship of unity of opposites between them betwwen. For reunderstanding in vivo and in vitro and to return to the original state of chloroplasts, this study has revealed that it is a transitional space for pre-treatment of substances needed for both plants and animals. Based on a comparison of their metabolism, has discovered that it is impossible have a direct relationship between plants / animals and physical, and that the traditional theory failed autotrophic / heterotrophic microorganisms. When it is full of these theoretical shortcomings, it smooths all the contradictions and questions, and learned the starting point and ending point of biodiversity Substances cycle successfully. Based on the fact that any transformation in the biological substances are the result of biochemical reactions, micro-organisms are confirmed sponsor this series of reactions, enzymes, coenzymes and vitamins are substances necessary for their participation in biochemical reactions. Therefore, solving physical problems how substances must have a relationship with plants and animals, set Relations between the three categories of living beings in the biological world and has formed a new understanding of theory.
Why is it difficult to form a unity of opposites between the bodies of animals and nature?
Why is not the same substances as the roots and leaves of plants absorb?
Why only reflect the biological chain of heterotrophic microorganisms, not reflect autotrophic?
Why not reflected step in the metabolism of biological organisms?
Why … …?
Although these problems have occupied our minds for many years and I tried many ways to solve them, we are still spinning on its periphery, could not touch your heart, and even that could not not be too theoretical exposition and proof. Well, where are the crux of these contradictions and doubts? And how to dig out their roots and find the key to unlock?
1. About vivo and in vitro
How to understand in vivo and in vitro is irrelevant. For example, a country's territorial waters are part of its maritime territory, which must be interpreted as the household with certain properties closure. But also contact international waters and oceans, with some degree of openness. This opening and closing is not necessary overclose pay attention to national sovereignty and both can be treated as the territorial jurisdiction of the country. However, it would mean a lot when applied to understand the animal's body.
The relationship between in vivo and in vitro, in essence, is how to apply the principles fundamental philosophy in the body of the animal and how to understand.
In vivo and in vitro which means here inside and outside trunk (trunk), respectively. If the gut is in liquidation and to go directly to the trunk, it would truncate the log of animals is equal to a tube with thick walls. His mouth and anus, respectively, at the entrance and exit, and the living to communicate with in vitro. Once this is understood, we always been to take the content and space in the digestive tract to in vivo, but in fact are part of in vitro (or transition "territorial waters" in vitro and in vivo), and the bodies of animals is essentially in the direction of the tube wall, with the exception of content and space in the gut, which only contains the cells of the body itself (for the territory).
Consequently, food and micro-organisms in this internal digestive tract are removed from live, because they are essentially in vitro despite living in vivo "in", not a body part (But within the sphere of influence of the body), only as spectators along the digestive tract. Thus, the relationship between body and nature is presented unification, and makes the body, plants (chyme) and microorganisms in the digestive tract in a consolidated report together.
Philosophically regarding compatible with the dynamic nature of the body is temporarily in a static state with respect to the period of animal life, which is very easy to understand. But how this conflict with the static body dynamic natural world? How to form a unity? So, in essence, is also a basic problem of philosophy to determine the movement of substances, either on a static body, and corresponds to the central unit of opposites, in order to achieve unification with plants.
The leader passway body absorbs nutrients from animals in nature is the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, food and micro-organisms through the digestive tract are constantly dynamic substances from the body fairly static. These substances are equivalent to the nature of the wall the body tube. On this point, it is difficult to be accepted in philosophy. But unfortunately, reality, we have always understood and treated as food and micro-organisms in the digestive tract and in vivo in the traditional theory and practice. That would contradict the philosophical principle above. If micro-organisms food and were included and treated as in vivo, is equal to that surrounding the body, insulate the body from the outside and be unable to form a static and dynamic association, which has created a misunderstanding.
The distinction between in vitro and in vivo plants seems relatively complex because of the chloroplasts. Substances absorbed by the roots of the earth, obviously, from in vitro, but absorbed by the leaves of plants seem to occur in vivo, since chloroplasts are found in the plant body (such as the gastrointestinal tract into the body of the animal). About the chloroplasts, the unanimous opinion of the scientific today is: "The endosymbiotic theory concerns the origin of mitochondria and plastids (chloroplasts, for example) which are organelles of eukaryotic cells. According to this theory, these organelles origin as separate prokaryotic organisms that have been taken within the cell as endosymbionts. Mitochondria developed from proteobacteria (in particular, Rickettsiales or close relatives) and chloroplasts from cyanobacteria (1). "Since that the function of chloroplasts came from the evolution of photosynthetic bacteria and has been widely adopted by the scientific community, we must adopt this presumption and to restore the chloroplasts, then try the indoor environment of the plant chloroplasts special digestive leaves (which is the space Pre-treatment of matter and energy for plant uptake), while its function is placed at the head of micro-organisms autotrophs. Surely no doubt the plants are capable of phytosynthesize some organic substances, but this function must be genetic micro-autotrophs and must still be put under autotrophic microorganisms.
Based on the above understanding of reality, all the substances necessary Animals and plants need a transition pretreatment, and space for the pretreatment of transition would be: the internal environment digestive tract of animals, the environment inside and chloroplasts and the area of ground covered by plant roots. Strictly speaking, these areas should not be counted directly, but in vitro. Thus, the conflict erupted interpretations of some pretreatment vegetable in vitro is necessary and part is in vitro, but the decay of all the substances needed live animals, and then realize unification of the digestive absorption of substances needed for roots and leaves, and also for a unification of the absorption digestive tract of animals and plants.
At the same time, the agreement may also be applied in the airways of animals and the device genito-urinary tract. Like all mammals, fertilization and pregnancy is carried out in vitro, it also comes at a unification of fertilization and pregnancy of all mammals, reptiles, birds and fish.
Based on the example of a thick-walled tube, understanding philosophical and scientific presumption chloroplasts and microorganisms chyme in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, micro-organisms in the soil and the substances are pending for the absorption plant roots and be pre-processed in chloroplasts are quite clear that in vitro, and are part of the dynamic nature of the interior our body thick-walled tube. Such understanding can solve some basic problems of how to understand the relationship between life and nature, and many problems have long puzzled we could be resolved.
2. serious shortcoming in the traditional theory in the metabolism Biological and chemical life cycle
The debate in vitro and in vivo is not a simple meaning of words, but involve the understanding and application some basic concepts in the life sciences and lead to a series of changes. At the same time, may provide a breakthrough for us to explain certain contradictions and uncertainties we face and we can see Suddenly the light.
Thanks reunderstanding concepts in vivo and in vitro, we can be aware not only had a vague wording on the nature and science of living in the past, but also learn about the obvious shortcomings of the theory traditional.
2.1. Names annotation
According exploration in theory, this study, there is a relationship of unity of opposites, both between plant and animal metabolism, and among the substances of normal enzyme and organic substances, so that some words have their meaning redefined to reflect this relationship.
2.1.1. Physical and chemical substances. Referring to physical substances, physical properties, and not pre-treated by microorganisms and chemical physical reaction, such as minerals. chemicals: one, with chemical properties, not pre-processed by micro-organisms and physico-chemical reaction and no chemical modification, such as minerals.
Chemicalized substances. Average pre-processed by micro-organisms and the physico-chemical reaction is a chemical change, such as mineral ions.
2.1.2. Ordinary and functional substances (biological) substances. functional substances refer to catalysts in biochemical reactions, such as enzymes, coenzymes and vitamins (2) and regular (organic) refer to substances catalysed biochemical reactions, such as carbohydrates and proteins normal.
Some secondary school textbooks hormones have been classified with the enzymes and vitamins, the components Functional organic matter (2). However, hormones are not involved in metabolic activities, and only play a role in regulating metabolism. So they are different from organic substances such as enzymes and vitamins, biochemical reactions and there is a relationship of unity of opposites between them and all the enzymes and vitamins, as well as ordinary organic substances. Because of the regulatory role of hormones, if there would be a close link between these genes and, pending additional verification (in this case, leave a space for the involvement of genes).
2.1.3. Phytosynthesis and restoration. Phytosynthesis ways to produce organic or inorganic substances plants and restoration of facilities to give or inorganic organic plants (2).
2.1.4. Decomposition (degradation) and composition (synthesis). Decomposition: the decomposition of plants or organic substances inside and the environment agency animal, and the composition of substances means thesynthesis decomposed in animals after absorption.Decomposition and sub-compositionbelong in the life cycle of these substances.
2.2. Plant and animal organs can not be directly related substances physical
For years we have been understanding of all food and micro-organisms in the digestive tract and in vivo. And also, we have shown understanding all substances in the environment of photosynthesis and chloroplasts in vivo. In this way, we can put these two questions together for a scan.
Because the chyme (food) and microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract used to be regarded as in vivo that lead to the traditional theory the body (or bodies of animals) to have a relationship with food, even became the organization directly related to the inorganic, For example, eating zinc could be to strengthen the brain and perhaps eat Calcium Supplement calcium, etc. In fact, all minerals in foods are organic, and their properties which are different in nature. According to the reflection of the following Table 2 that chemicalized be allowed to enter in the basic life cycle and minerals look here as chemicals, but in physical reality, without a chemical change and are not qualified to join the biological metabolism. As Mr. Yang Zhen-Bo, an expert on water quality monitoring station of the Chinese environmental health, said: "In fact, only live plants can absorb and use minerals in the soil inorganic and organic minerals that plants can be transformed absorbed and used by humans and animals. Almost nobody can absorb nutrients from inorganic minerals and nobody can effective use of inorganic minerals in vivo (3) "
While all sorts of books and research papers are told that the minerals can not be absorbed by plants and animals' bodies when they were in their ionic state, such as understanding and applying the above to plants and animals have a direct relationship with natural substances has continued until today in agriculture, nutriology and medical science, and language that reflects this relationship can also be found everywhere, such as:
Substances Actual physical substances absorbed by plants and animals
Mineral (or ground) mineral ions
The water hydrogen ion
Carbon dioxide and oxides of carbon ions
the power of the sun
2.3. "Forced Marriage" in the metabolism of plants and animals
To be worse, decomposers and producers are united in the basic theory of life sciences – the organic chain, and seem to lock securely without fault.
As for the meaning of decomposers, which apparently refers to heterotrophic microorganisms. In this sense, it there should be no doubt, because in practice we do not understand and treated like that. Decomposition of organic material, for example, could be directly absorbed by plant roots (organic substances available Plant roots are a very small amount). Clearly, such an understanding and the application has losed the procedure to remove electrons from autotrophic microorganisms, and has created a theoretical vacuum necessary.
In the cycle of substance that heterotrophic microorganisms (decomposers) insisted on the traditional theory and the decomposers "that reflected in the process of organic, inorganic, but only an ornament for the other levels of treatment chemicals. Even in the life cycle of substances in accordance the law of the unity of opposites, which come into existence on the opposite side, but in fact, no trace of its opposite side. Creating an error of principle in philosophy.
In this analysis, we can see clearly that there is no direct link between plants and heterotrophic microorganisms. Interestingly, many theoretical studies have estimated that only substances that the ions can be absorbed by plant roots. But in the application theory, due to breakage of chloroplasts, we have been providing direct natural substances such as carbon dioxide, the light of sun, water and minerals, plants. If these relationships are not obvious enough shade and most obvious is the traditional chain organic has openly stated that crossed the autotrophs and decomposers direct pressure "to sing a drama with plants, staging a typical scene of "forced marriage".
On the relationship between substances in the human (or animal) and is ingested, the traditional theory the application was nothing less than marriage "forced", and makes the man (or animal) that is directly linked to ingested substances. Be reflected more clearly in Table 1 below.
(Continuing) (available at http://www.bbfactor.com/group.php?keyno=26 )
About the Author
No responses yet. You could be the first!